Close Menu
Business explainer
    • ABOUT
    • BOOK STORE
    • ENTREPRENEURSHIP
    • ESG
    • EVENTS & AWARDS
    • POLITICS
    • GADGETS
    • CONTACT
    X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook
    Business explainerBusiness explainer
    • TRENDING
    • EXECUTIVES
    • COMPANIES
    • STARTUPS
    • GLOBAL
    • AGRICULTURE
    • DEALS
    • ECONOMY
    • MOTORING
    • TECHNOLOGY
    Business explainer
    Home » Pepkor CEO fails to set aside R320m tax bill
    EXECUTIVES

    Pepkor CEO fails to set aside R320m tax bill

    August 23, 2023By Staff Writer
    Pieter Erasmus - Pepkor CEO

    Pieter Erasmus, CEO of retailer Pepkor, has been unsuccessful in his attempt to have a R320 million tax bill dismissed.

    1. The South African Revenue Service (SARS) audited Erasmus and found him liable for R183 million in back taxes and R137 million in understatement penalties.
    2. SARS claims that the back taxes are related to a R1.4 billion distribution received by Erasmus and his family trust in 2015 from a company called Treemo. The distribution consisted of R167 million via a capital distribution and R1.22 billion via a cash distribution.
    3. Erasmus and his family trust were shareholders in Treemo, and SARS alleges that he attempted to avoid paying taxes on the distribution through an impermissible tax avoidance arrangement.
    4. Erasmus argues that the distributions he received were fully exempt from tax. He claims that the R167 million capital payout was tax-free as it constituted a return of capital, and the R1.22 billion cash distribution should not be taxed as Treemo had over R1 billion in Secondary Tax on Companies (STC) credits.
    5. SARS accuses Erasmus of contriving complex transactions to obtain the STC credits solely to evade dividend tax. They argue that the distributions were not exempt and should be subject to taxation.
    6. Erasmus took the tax assessment on review to the Western Cape High Court, seeking a quicker and more convenient resolution. However, the court ruled that tax reviews can only succeed in civil courts under exceptional circumstances and that Erasmus should follow the regular process of lodging an objection or appealing to a tax court.

    Related Posts

    EDITORIAL – What Absa’s CEO Pay Package Reveals About South Africa’s Banking 

    March 11, 2026

    The Board that Suspended Its CEO had no Legal Right

    March 10, 2026

    From CFO to CEO: the Man Who Must Fix Spar

    March 8, 2026
    Top Posts

    B-BBEE is Justice and the Only Way Forward, Says Dr Moleko

    November 16, 2025

    The Key Forces Influencing South Africa’s SME Economy

    November 21, 2025

    Seven Families Sue OpenAI In ChatGPT Suicide Scandal

    November 10, 2025

    Construction Boom Delivers 176,000 Jobs as Unemployment Eases

    November 11, 2025
    Don't Miss
    COMPANIES

    How Growthpoint is Quietly Rebuilding South Africa’s Property Sector

    COMPANIES

    Growthpoint Properties has reported a meaningful turnaround in its half-year results for the period ended…

    EDITORIAL – What Absa’s CEO Pay Package Reveals About South Africa’s Banking 

    Standard Bank Namibia Appoints Allvan Farmer as Chief Information Officer

    The Richest Family in South Africa Sells Shares Worth R4.9bn

    Stay In Touch
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    About Us
    About Us

    From the latest product launches and company earnings to economic trends and industry disruptions, we distill the most critical details and implications – breaking through the jargon and wordiness to give you just what matters most.

    Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
    Categories
    • TRENDING
    • EXECUTIVES
    • COMPANIES
    • STARTUPS
    • GLOBAL
    • AGRICULTURE
    • DEALS
    • ECONOMY
    • MOTORING
    • TECHNOLOGY
    contact us
    • Get In Touch
    © 2026 Business Explainer.
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.