Close Menu
    • ABOUT
    • BOOK STORE
    • ENTREPRENEURSHIP
    • ESG
    • EVENTS & AWARDS
    • POLITICS
    • GADGETS
    • CONTACT
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Business explainer
    Wednesday, September 23
    • TRENDING
    • EXECUTIVES
    • COMPANIES
    • STARTUPS
    • GLOBAL
    • AGRICULTURE
    • DEALS
    • Ai
    • ECONOMY
    • MOTORING
    • TECHNOLOGY
    Business explainer
    Home » PIC Boss Condemns Massive BEE Settlement at Lanseria
    DEALS

    PIC Boss Condemns Massive BEE Settlement at Lanseria

    November 8, 20253 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram WhatsApp
    Follow Us
    Google News
    Patrick Dlamini, PIC CEO
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Copy Link

    The chief executive of the Public Investment Corporation has expressed outrage over a R400 million disbursement to the black economic empowerment partner in Lanseria Airport, deeming the underlying assessment as entirely inappropriate. Patrick Dlamini, the head of Africa’s largest asset manager, is reportedly incensed that Acapulco Trade and Invest received this sum following an arbitration that hinged on what the board views as an inflated appraisal of the airport’s worth. As reported by News24, this payment has prompted the board to consider pursuing legal recourse to recover the funds, highlighting deep concerns over the transaction’s integrity.

    At the core of the board’s discontent is the belief that Lanseria’s value was overstated by approximately R1.7 billion, enabling Acapulco to secure a substantial settlement despite forfeiting its equity due to an unpaid debt. The arbitration relied on a valuation by Crowe, which positioned Acapulco’s 25 per cent holding at around R1 billion, allowing the firm to exit with a significant gain even after settling a R600 million obligation, inclusive of interest. According to Business Day, Acapulco had obtained a R333.2 million loan from the Public Investment Corporation in 2013 to acquire its stake, with the repayment due on the tenth anniversary of the initial advance in late 2023.

    Acapulco’s default on the escalated debt led the corporation to enforce its security by assuming control of the shares. Subsequent valuation disputes ensued, with both parties initially engaging BDO, whose draft was rejected, culminating in Crowe’s appointment. The corporation contests Crowe’s findings, citing fundamental errors such as double-counting, which artificially elevated the airport’s worth from a March 2025 estimate of R1.4 billion—valuing Acapulco’s portion at R350 million—to R4 billion.

    This episode has intensified scrutiny on the corporation’s governance, particularly following allegations by political figures of widespread impropriety in its dealings. The Public Investment Corporation has refuted claims of corruption in the payout, asserting that it adhered to legal mandates and is preparing comprehensive briefings for the president and parliament to demonstrate compliance. As noted by Business Day, the board’s potential litigation underscores a commitment to accountability, amid broader calls for inquiries into its investment practices.

    Acapulco is held by individuals including Kagiso Matjila, son of a former director-general, alongside other partners. The transaction also involves Harith General Partners, though it was not party to the dispute. Previous similar accusations against associated entities have been dismissed by courts, reinforcing the corporation’s stance on procedural fairness.

    The Public Investment Corporation manages assets exceeding R3 trillion, primarily pension funds for government employees, making such settlements highly sensitive to public oversight. According to News24, Dlamini’s reaction reflects internal frustrations with the arbitration outcome, which legal advice compelled the entity to honour despite reservations. This case echoes ongoing debates on black economic empowerment efficacy and valuation transparency in public investments, potentially influencing future deal structures.

    As detailed by Business Report, the corporation’s response includes forming technical groups to monitor compliance and address illicit activities, aiming to restore confidence amid political pressures. The incident has drawn comparisons to past controversies, prompting renewed calls for enhanced regulatory frameworks in state-owned asset management.

    Follow on Google News
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link WhatsApp

    Related Posts

    EcoRich Solutions Named Africa Winner

    September 22, 2026

    Exclusive Networks and Okta Extend Strategic Distribution Partnership

    September 22, 2026

    Onafriq Joins FINASA to Support the Growth of Cross-Border Payments in South Africa

    September 22, 2026

    EXPLAINED: Southern Africa and China Pharmaceutical Deal

    September 22, 2026
    Top Posts

    Absa Launches Grant Fund to Back Young Entrepreneurs

    July 26, 20263,215

    Old Mutual Shareholders Reject CEO Pay Plan

    July 16, 20263,040

    PIC Board Suspends Its CEO

    July 13, 20262,806

    Avatar Confirms Ngubane’s Abrupt Exit as Co-Chief Creative Officer

    July 22, 20262,484
    Don't Miss

    Before You Nominate Your Child as Executor, Consider This

    September 22, 2026 OPINION

    Nominating your child as executor of your will may leave them with one of the…

    EcoRich Solutions Named Africa Winner

    September 22, 2026

    Cars.co.za Launches Motor Industry Report

    September 22, 2026

    Stop Fighting for a Slice of the Pie, Bake a New One

    September 22, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook

    Business Explainer proudly displays the “FAIR” stamp of the Press Council of South Africa, indicating our commitment to adhere to the Code of Ethics for Print and online media which prescribes that our reportage is truthful, accurate and fair. Should you wish to lodge a complaint about our news coverage, please lodge a complaint on the Press Council’s website, www.presscouncil.org.za or email the complaint to khanyim@presscouncilsa.org.za Contact the Press Council on 011 4843612.

    Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
    Categories
    • TRENDING
    • EXECUTIVES
    • COMPANIES
    • STARTUPS
    • GLOBAL
    • AGRICULTURE
    • DEALS
    • Ai
    • ECONOMY
    • MOTORING
    • TECHNOLOGY
    contact us
    • Get In Touch
    Facebook X (Twitter)
    • Privacy Policy
    © 2026 Business Explainer .

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.